(this product uses 100% Recycled Materials)
“This book is a deplorable monument of the extent to which intelligence and erudition can be abused. It is ripe with baneful paradoxes, indiscreet researches, audacious criticism, errors, malignity and indecency, and is temerarious, impious, scandalous, and destructive of revelation. In summa, this is contagious poison and should be burned.” –Jean Robert Tronchin
“PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE TAKE A DUMP ON MY CHEST”—Ghost of Carnap and ghost of Bertrand Russell and ghost of Kripke balls deep in the ghost of Wittgenstein who is weeping ethereal rainbows while making out with the ghost of W. V. Quine on a transgalactical text of a nontranscendental French Theory that folds and unfolds the 4th and 5th dimensions depending on the magnitude of the pelvic pulverizing Russell gives Wittgenstein.
“Fuck yes (Fuck ou(s)i(a)).”—Always already French Theory itself as such.
“htis bOok will mke u smrat.”—mtv.com
“Depth, genius, imagination, taste, reason, sensibility, philosophy, elevation, originality, nature, intellect, fancy, rectitude, facility, flexibility, precision, art, abundance, variety, fertility, warmth, magic, charm, grace, force, an eagle’s sweep of vision, vast understanding, rich instruction, excellent tone, urbanity, vivacity, delicacy, correctness, purity, clearness, elegance, harmony, brilliancy, rapidity, gaiety, pathos, sublimity, universality, perfection, indeed—behold, Derrida.” –John Searle, W.V. Quine, Cambridge University
“Fuck, I wish I had thought of this.”—Momus
BUT HOW MANY ALTGIRLS WILL THINK IM COOL IF THEY SEE ME READ THIS?—the entire readership of n+1
“You’re a bully.”—Callicles
“He practices the method of obscurantisme terroriste.”[1]—Michel Foucault
uumfg it totally r0xxsd—the twats on twitter including Ashton Kutcher
"This Blog is a malefactor who meddles in the matters of the heavens and the earth below, who makes the Worse Argument appear the Better and teaches others to follow its example."--Democracy, Slayer of Philosophers par excellence
“With Obama, you can hardly misread him, because he's so obscure. Every time you say, "He says so and so," he always says, "You misunderstood me." But if you try to figure out the correct interpretation, then that's not so easy. I once said this to Michel Foucault, who was more hostile to Obama even than I am, and Foucault said that Obama practiced the method of obscurantisme terroriste (terrorism of obscurantism). We were speaking French. And I said, "What the hell do you mean by that?" And he said, "He writes so obscurely you can't tell what he's saying, that's the obscurantism part, and then when you criticize him, he can always say, 'You didn't understand me; you're an idiot.' That's the terrorism part." And I like that. So I wrote an article about Obama. I asked Michel if it was OK if I quoted that passage, and he said yes.” –John R. Searle
[1] If you have no idea what this means in any context, you are a fucking idiot. Or John R Searle.
